AI-powered document drafting & review workflows

Draft and Review RFP Responses RFP Responses in Minutes, Not Days.

Catch errors, inconsistencies, and compliance gaps across your documents before anything goes out.

Trusted by professionals and teams across industries

Cushman & Wakefield Oakbank NexLiving Artis REIT TM Investments CentreCourt Parmer Development Garnet Venturon ARM Capital Advisory RFA

How It Works

From raw files to clean deliverables

Upload your files, draft documents in minutes, and review everything before it goes out.

1

Upload Your Files

Drop your documents, spreadsheets, and supporting files into a project. Connect your data room — Stepscale indexes everything.

2

Draft & Review

AI drafts documents from your source files — then reviews everything for errors, gaps, and compliance issues.

3

Send with Confidence

Documents go out clean and on time. What used to take days of manual drafting and checking now takes minutes.

Professionals love Stepscale

What used to take days now takes minutes

Stepscale has completely transformed the way we work. It's like having an extra team of analysts working around the clock, letting us focus on strategy and clients instead of reviewing documents and spreadsheets.

Mark MacGregor

Mark MacGregor

Arm Capital Advisory

Stepscale is best in class. It has cut through complexity, sped up my project timelines, and elevated work that was previously only possible with a large team.

Chris Spagnolo

Chris Spagnolo

Garnet Group

RFP responses Proposals Contracts Reports Offering memorandums Due diligence packages RFP responses Proposals Contracts Reports Offering memorandums Due diligence packages
Financial models Audit reports Legal agreements Compliance reports Term sheets LOIs Financial models Audit reports Legal agreements Compliance reports Term sheets LOIs

Draft faster, deliver cleaner

Save hours on every project

10,000+ Issues Caught

Errors and inconsistencies identified across documents

1,500+ Documents Processed

Documents drafted and reviewed across active projects

~90% Fewer Errors

Compared to manual drafting and review processes

Days → Minutes

Draft and review documents that used to take days of manual work

Your team's document partner

Draft and review every document before it goes out

Expert-Level AI Drafts & Reviews

Draft and review proposals, contracts, and reports with expert-level AI

Problem

Busy teams are constantly under pressure to review and finalize documents with senior reviewers overloaded leading to mistakes that slip through.

Stepscale

Performs comprehensive reviews in minutes
Applies consistent custom review steps every time
Learns from past reviews run by expert team members

Result

Greater sign-off confidence with Stepscale reviews.

Review Findings

Quarterly_IM_Draft_v3.pdf

4 issues found
Revenue figure mismatch Critical

Page 14 states $4.2M revenue. GL_Ledger shows $3.9M for same period.

Cross-ref: GL_Ledger_Export.xlsx → Sheet "Q3 Revenue"

Reused assumption — unvalidated Critical

5.2% growth rate on page 22 copied from prior model. No updated source cited.

Cross-ref: Model_v2.xlsx → "Assumptions" tab

Clause reference inconsistency Warning

Section 4.1 references "Exhibit C" but no Exhibit C is attached to the document.

Cross-ref: Service_Agreement_v2.pdf → Exhibit index

Version drift detected Warning

Cap table on page 31 reflects v1 ownership structure. Current version shows different allocations.

Cross-ref: CapTable_Final.xlsx → "Current"

Reviewed 248 pages across 4 files

in 5 minutes

Catch & Resolve Issues

Catch inconsistent numbers, missing clauses, and disclosure gaps

Problem

Manual reviews happen one document at a time causing critical misalignment between versions, reference materials, email threads, and decisions made in meetings.

Stepscale

Cross-references reviews with all project files
Tracks email threads relevant to each review
Takes meeting notes for greater review context

Result

Fewer surprises post document signoffs.

Context Sources

Active for this review

4 sources active

Data Room

23 files · Models, financials, legal docs

Matched 6

Inbox Scan

Scanned 14 days of deal-related threads

2 updates

Meeting Transcripts

3 recorded calls · Oct 4, Oct 11, Oct 18

1 conflict

Prior Document Version

Quarterly_IM_Draft_v2.pdf

3 changes

Sources actively cross-referenced

Reduced Miscommunications

Ensure key details stay consistent across every document

Problem

Multiple authors, email threads, and decisions made in meetings create version drift and miscommunication causing discrepancies and gaps in final documents.

Stepscale

Tracks changes across document versions
Flags conflicting language, assumptions, and data
Surfaces misalignment between stakeholder communications

Result

Fewer inconsistencies in approved documents.

Inbox Review

Q4_IM_Draft_v4.pdf · 38 emails scanned

3 risks found
Effective date mismatch in document edits Critical

Document lists effective date as April 1. Lead attorney's email on March 10 confirms policy goes live March 15.

Source: Email thread "Policy Timeline Update" → March 10

Compliance requirement differs from guidance email Critical

Draft mandates monthly audits. Compliance team email on Feb 28 clarifies quarterly schedule was approved by board.

Source: Email "Board Decision — Audit Frequency" → Feb 28

Stakeholder sign-offs across multiple versions Warning

Two stakeholders approved different versions via email. No consensus confirmation on the current draft version.

Source: "Approved v2" (Feb 27) vs. "OK to proceed v3" (Mar 2)

Notifications sent to your inbox

Increased Compliance

Stay aligned with regulations and internal policies

Problem

Manually checking for adherence to every regulation, updated standard, and compliance requirement is prone to errors that make their way to submitted documents.

Stepscale

Cross-checks against regulatory requirements
Flags compliance gaps and potential legal risks
Links review findings back to source standards

Result

Reduced legal and compliance risk.

Compliance Check

Offering_Memorandum_Final.pdf

2 gaps found

SEC Regulation D — Rule 506(b)

Accredited investor requirements present and correctly stated

Pass

Anti-Money Laundering (AML)

KYC and source-of-funds language included and adequate

Pass

FINRA Rule 2210 — Communications

Gap

Risk disclosure on page 8 does not meet fair and balanced presentation standard. Past performance referenced without required disclaimer.

Accredited Investor Definition — SEC Rule 501

Review

Income/net worth thresholds referenced match current 2024 limits. Verify all calculations align with updated standards.

Gaps surfaced before submission

Centralized Workspace

One place for every project — drafts, reviews, and collaboration

Problem

Responsibility for document reviews is often fragmented across team members with required contextual information spread across team folders, email threads, and meeting notes never captured.

Stepscale

Tracks review findings with full team visibility
Allows teams to directly collaborate on reviews
Enables a structured and reliable review process

Result

Clear accountability with lower financial and business risk.

Issue Tracker

FY2025_Audit_Q3_Review · 4 open items

2 resolved 4 open

Revenue recognition timing discrepancy

Assigned: S. Chen · Source: Income_Statement_v3.xlsx

Resolved

Accrual calculation inconsistency — Note 7

Assigned: M. Johnson · Source: Financial_Statements.pdf

Resolved

Depreciation method change not disclosed

Assigned: A. Lopez · Source: Balance_Sheet_Backup.xlsx

In review

Internal control weakness documentation missing

Assigned: Unassigned · Source: SOX_Compliance_Memo.docx

Needs action

Approval record

Oct 22, 2024
JM
TN
RP

3 reviewers · All findings logged with source links

Maintain review depth under pressure

Project Phoenix — Investment Memorandum

Confidential · Draft v4 · 42 pages

Executive Summary

Financial Overview

Revenue & EBITDA

Key Assumptions

Sensitivity Cases

Supporting Schedules

Transaction Terms

Client Communications

Regulatory & Compliance

Approvals & Sign-Off

Prepared for internal review only. Do not distribute

Enterprise grade security built in

Your project data stays yours

Stepscale is built to handle the most confidential documents.

Shared AI
3rd Parties

Confidential

Private by design

Stepscale never uses your documents or prompts to train underlying AI models. Your information stays yours, always.

AES-256
At rest
TLS 1.3
In transit

Secure

Bank-grade encryption

Data is encrypted using AES-256 and TLS 1.3, the same standards used by leading financial institutions.

Deal Access

Active
MS

Madison Smith

Owner

JK

James Kim

Editor

?

External Party

No access

Private

You control access

Work together or keep projects private. Control who can view documents, drafts, and findings across each project.

Pricing

Simple, flexible plans

Choose the right plan for your team and scale as you grow.

Save 20%

Professional

For smaller teams

$79 /user/month USD

Billed annually

Review a file now!
  • Unlimited AI Reviews
  • Connect your data room for Reviews
  • Inbox Alerts
  • Meeting notetaker

Business

For larger company wide deployments

Custom Pricing
Contact us
  • Bulk seat pricing based on team size and usage
  • Hands-on team onboarding and training sessions
  • Live chat, email, and phone support
  • Data residency & deployment options

“We are obsessed with helping our clients deliver accurate work and move forward with confidence.”