Product Updates

Stepscale’s Reviews and Tracker Are Now Live

From flagging findings to tracking resolution, Reviews and Tracker give your team a clear system to catch and close issues across every deliverable.

Jan 6, 2026

PDF Phase1_ESA_Report.pdf Page 18 of 94

Site Assessment Findings

Regulatory Compliance

UST not addressed in conclusions pg. 18
Vapor intrusion not scoped pg. 22
Adjacent site history incomplete pg. 31
Project Tracker 6 of 14 resolved
3 Open
5 In Review
0 Dismissed
6 Resolved

NOI calculation corrected

CIM_Draft_v3.pdf · Resolved Jan 8

Lease expiry date updated

Rent_Roll.xlsx · Resolved Jan 9

UST not addressed in conclusions

Phase1_ESA_Report.pdf · Open

High

Vapor intrusion not scoped

Phase1_ESA_Report.pdf · Open

Med

Scope gap in electrical bid

GC_Bid_Package.pdf · Awaiting revision

Med
PDF CIM_Draft.pdf
3 5 4
Tracker 5 of 12
NOI corrected
Lease date fixed
Cap rate missing
Scope gap in bid

Most issues in real estate development don’t come from one big mistake.

They come from a series of errors, miscommunications, and discrepancies buried across project deliverables that get missed during manual checks.

That can look like a due diligence report with a missed assumption, a CIM with conflicting numbers, an RFP response with scope gaps, a drawing set that misses a code requirement, or a change order approved without the right backup.

Stepscale Reviews + Tracker are designed to prevent that.

Where teams use Reviews + Tracker

Common checks and reviews we see across development teams include:

  • Due diligence checks (pro forma assumptions, Phase 1 ESA, geotechnical reports)

  • CIM QA (risks, inconsistencies)

  • Bid leveling (scope coverage, exclusions, ambiguous language)

  • Building code checks (architectural drawings and permit sets)

  • Marketing QA (against approved plans and disclosures)

  • Change order + payment run validation (before releasing funds)

How it works

1) Upload a file and start a Review

When you add a new file to a Review, Stepscale suggests three review workflows based on the document type. If you want to check for something specific, you can also add custom instructions.

2) Get clear, source-tied findings

Once the review is complete, Stepscale flags a list of findings and ties each one back to the exact page and source it came from, so you can jump straight to the right spot in a 200-page report or drawing set.

3) Clear what doesn’t apply and close what’s resolved

Dismiss findings as needed, and mark issues as resolved once they’re addressed.

4) Track what’s still open through revisions

Any findings that aren’t cleared are automatically added to the project Tracker, so nothing gets lost between internal review, consultant revisions, and re-submission.

Why it matters

  • Reduce rework and delays caused by missed details across drawings, reports, and submissions

  • Cut back-and-forth with consultants and partners with clear, page-based findings

  • Get a detailed final check before you hit send or release funds

See it on a real deliverable

If you’d like to see how Reviews + Tracker fit into your development workflow, book a demo with our team.

OTHER BLOGS

Read more

Deliver every engagement with greater confidence

See how Stepscale surfaces errors and hidden risks before they become problems.

Deliver every engagement with greater confidence

See how Stepscale surfaces errors and hidden risks before they become problems.

Deliver every engagement with greater confidence

See how Stepscale surfaces errors and hidden risks before they become problems.